Skip to main content

.Net under OpenSource

I have been spending a lot of my online time on researching “.Net in OpenSource” on request from a friend. Below are presented the results of this research. The sources include – OpenSource websites, replies from Linux/OpenSource community to my queries, and the Microsoft website. I am starting with a bit of a background; some of you might want to skip it.

When we talk of .Net we are referring to a new development platform promoted by Microsoft and standardized by the ECMA (European Computer Manufacturer's Association). This platform consists of a virtual machine (like the JVM), a class library, a language (C#) and a language specification that compilers can follow if they want to generate classes and code.
When we talk of OpenSource we refer to a philosophy that code should be shared and not copyrighted. The code generated for OpenSource is instead copy left-ed which means protected from being copyrighted by anyone by use of licenses like GNU Public license (GPL) and GNU LGPL etc. The sharing of code has given rise to emergence of large collaborative projects that have volunteers working on them from all parts of the globe and developing world class applications.

Now when talking about “.Net under OpenSource” we can mean two things.

  • Code written for .Net (i.e. programs in C#) is shared among developers on the net or otherwise. These programs are OpenSource-d which means protected under GPL which makes them free. However, one cannot call these programs free because, to compile and run them one will still require Microsoft’s Compiler and Virtual Machine which themselves are not free. Thus we find that though such programs will be able to exploit the benefits of sharing by using OpenSource, their development will still be a ‘costly’ affair. Some places for such projects are
  • http://www.icsharpcode.net
  • http://csharp-source.net

  • The other thing that has happened is that even the OpenSource community has appreciated the .Net platform for its approach. Here is what they say – “What makes the Common Language Infrastructure development platform interesting is that it is a good mix of technologies that have been nicely integrated.” Thus they found that Microsoft was in a way helping one of the goals of an OpenSource project called GNOME. This project was itself an attempt to come up with what they call - Common Language Infrastructure.
    So GNOME project has decided to do to .Net what GNU did to UNIX in the 80’s. Develop an OpenSource clone of the .Net platform replete with the virtual machine, compiler, and libraries. Now in this project not only be users able to share the C# programs but also share the code for the compiler and virtual machine which run them. This way the costs can be lowered completely as development tools are also free. Further with the codes being open there is a possibility that all bugs in the platform and class libraries will be removed faster than the original Microsoft .Net.
    This version of .Net is being christened dotGNU. For more on this goto: http://gotmono.com/
    Some projects using dotGNU are
  • http://beaglewiki.org/
  • http://www.gnome.org/projects/f-spot/
  • http://foresightlinux.com
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How will travel industry transform post-Covid

Unlike philosophers, journalists and teenagers, the world of entrepreneurship does not permit the luxury of gazing into a crystal ball to predict the future. An entrepreneur’s world is instead made of MVPs (Minimum Viable Product), A/B Tests, launching products, features or services and gauging / measuring their reception in the market to arrive at verifiable truths which can drive the business forward. Which is why I have never written about my musings or hypothesis about travel industry – we usually either seek customer feedback or launch an MVPised version and gather market feedback. However, with Covid-19 travel bans across the globe, the industry is currently stuck – while a lot of industry reports and journalistic conjectures are out, there’s no definitive answer to the way forward. Besides there is no way to test your hypothesis since even the traveller does not know what they will do when skies open. So, I decided to don my blogger hat and take the luxury of crystal gazing...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Guide to Privacy on Social Media [apps]

The recent announcement by WhatsApp to update its privacy terms - and 'accept or leave the app' stance - led to an exodus of users from Whastapp to competing, privacy-conscious apps such as Telegram or Signal. A week after the exodus began, Whatsapp clarified its stance - and WhatsApp's CEO went about providing a long Twitter clarification . And then, many returned, many who considered moving stayed put on Whatsapp. This post is meant for those who are still sitting on the fence - it clarifies questions like: What is this all about? What do I do? Is Whatsapp safe? I've heard Telegram is Russian - so how is it safer than Whatsapp? I can't move because my business contacts are on Whastapp - how do I secure myself? PS: I've modeled this post based on several conversations I've had with friends and family on this subject, dealing with the chain of questions they ask, then objections they raise, then clarifications they seek - and finally the change resistance ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learning from 11 years in KPMG

It is only when we give up what we have is when we can embrace the new! I quit my job at KPMG one year ago - 22 January 2016 was my last day with the firm. As I reflect back on that day, it felt more like a graduation day! The eerie mix of nostalgia, excitement, anxiety and blues of missing your friends. KPMG was not just my first job but also a place where I learnt everything that I represent professionally. KPMG is one of the institutions I deeply respect and love – and relationships I have built here will stay with me for my lifetime. In my entrepreneurial career as well, I am often reminded more of all the great things I have learnt over my 11 years in KPMG. An year gone by, I realize these learnings have stayed with me and apply equally to the world outside KPMG. Almost all would apply to those working in role of (internal or external) consultants but several are generic and can be applied across professions. I have tried to change the text so that the learnings sound ...
7 comments
Read more