Skip to main content

Cities in India – Part III

In this Series: Part I, Part II
Today whether you visit Mumbai or Dehradun the same scene awaits you – traffic bursting from the seams, lack of amenities, overcrowded public transport (whether it is the Mumbai local, the tempo in Dehradun or shared-rickshaw in Vadodara).

Why has this happened? Clearly, we have never looked at our cities in a scientific and organized fashion, our cities emerged just like other countries, as centres of trade. However, cities which should have evolved gradually underwent destruction and a military set-up was imposed on them. Today are imposing a commercial infrastructure over the same military set-up creating a further confused landscape on one hand and choking the amenities and resources on the other.

What can we do to solve these problems? I have few thoughts in mind:

Macro level
  • We should de-congest existing cities by shifting out industries from them to newer, better planned cities (for example the way industries were moved from Mumbai to Navi-Mumbai and Nasik)
  • We must create newer centers of development via SEZ and RISC models. SEZ will create newer areas for industry to set up, while RISC will improve access of resources to existing businesses and people
Micro Level
  • We need to redesign our existing mega-cities: speedy creation of flyovers, mass transit systems and other amenities and infrastructure. Lets learn from international cities like London and New-York.
  • Smaller cities need improvement: not every small city needs to grow into a metropolis, not every city needs to have suburbs, flyovers etc. We need to learn from the set-up in Europe where many small cities exist well connected by high-speed transport between them rather than within them. But the standard of amenities and infrastructure needs to improve in all cities alike.
There are however some more questions that I am yet to answer and are a point of debate:
  • Do we need few big cities or many small cities?
  • Should we impose the infra of one set-up over another – should old large cities be exploited like this. Shouldn’t old cities be kept as it is than loaded further? Should we not rather improve other cities than overuse the existing cities?
  • If we must create new cities, how should “the new city of India” be? What are the needs of the new workforce?
  • How do we connect our existing and new cities? Is a high speed rail network the solution or should we connect them by air and use cities to feed a hub-and-spoke rail network?
I will explore answers to some of the above questions on this blog in future. For now, this series of posts is concluded.

. concluded

Comments

  1. Nikhil, good post (after a long time); however, I do have some thoughts on it. Let me jot them down and we can discuss/ debate on it. if it'll go long, i'll put it on my blog and update you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How will travel industry transform post-Covid

Unlike philosophers, journalists and teenagers, the world of entrepreneurship does not permit the luxury of gazing into a crystal ball to predict the future. An entrepreneur’s world is instead made of MVPs (Minimum Viable Product), A/B Tests, launching products, features or services and gauging / measuring their reception in the market to arrive at verifiable truths which can drive the business forward. Which is why I have never written about my musings or hypothesis about travel industry – we usually either seek customer feedback or launch an MVPised version and gather market feedback. However, with Covid-19 travel bans across the globe, the industry is currently stuck – while a lot of industry reports and journalistic conjectures are out, there’s no definitive answer to the way forward. Besides there is no way to test your hypothesis since even the traveller does not know what they will do when skies open. So, I decided to don my blogger hat and take the luxury of crystal gazing...

A Guide to Privacy on Social Media [apps]

The recent announcement by WhatsApp to update its privacy terms - and 'accept or leave the app' stance - led to an exodus of users from Whastapp to competing, privacy-conscious apps such as Telegram or Signal. A week after the exodus began, Whatsapp clarified its stance - and WhatsApp's CEO went about providing a long Twitter clarification . And then, many returned, many who considered moving stayed put on Whatsapp. This post is meant for those who are still sitting on the fence - it clarifies questions like: What is this all about? What do I do? Is Whatsapp safe? I've heard Telegram is Russian - so how is it safer than Whatsapp? I can't move because my business contacts are on Whastapp - how do I secure myself? PS: I've modeled this post based on several conversations I've had with friends and family on this subject, dealing with the chain of questions they ask, then objections they raise, then clarifications they seek - and finally the change resistance ...

Learning from 11 years in KPMG

It is only when we give up what we have is when we can embrace the new! I quit my job at KPMG one year ago - 22 January 2016 was my last day with the firm. As I reflect back on that day, it felt more like a graduation day! The eerie mix of nostalgia, excitement, anxiety and blues of missing your friends. KPMG was not just my first job but also a place where I learnt everything that I represent professionally. KPMG is one of the institutions I deeply respect and love – and relationships I have built here will stay with me for my lifetime. In my entrepreneurial career as well, I am often reminded more of all the great things I have learnt over my 11 years in KPMG. An year gone by, I realize these learnings have stayed with me and apply equally to the world outside KPMG. Almost all would apply to those working in role of (internal or external) consultants but several are generic and can be applied across professions. I have tried to change the text so that the learnings sound ...