Skip to main content

Karat should draw a leaf out of Premchand’s story

Those of you who have grown up in the Hindi speaking states would have read Munshi Premchand’s iconic story Panch Parmeshwar. Briefly it goes like this:
Algu Chaudhary and Jumman Sheikh are two close friends in the village. One day a dispute between Jumman and his neighbours comes to be arbitrated by the village Panchayat, (village council cum judicial body) of which Algu Chaudhary is nominated as the Sarpanch (head). While everyone expects Algu to rule in favour of Jumman, with responsibility of being righteous upon him, Algu finds himself in tricky situation to see that Jumman actually is on the wrong side. Finally, Algu rules against Jumman leading to a major drift in their friendship.

A few months later, Algu is similarly involved in a dispute. Realising that Jumman would be eager to take revenge, Algu’s adversary requests appointment of Jumman as the Sarpanch. However, as soon as Jumman assumes the post, he realizes the immense responsibility that the position comes with and is able to appreciate Algu’s situation when he had ruled against Jumman. Finally, he gives up the thought of any revenge or prejudice against Algu and rules in his favour on finding Algu to be in the righteous position.

Just like the Sarpanch, the position of the speaker of the Lok Sabha is a position of righteousness. The speaker is above all partisan politics and is never expected to take sides for or against anyone – neither the opposition nor the treasury benches.

T.R. Andhyarujina has pointed out correctly in the Hindustan Times today that M/s Karat & Co, need to understand the above and leave the Hon. Speaker Somnath Chatterji out of the trust vote politics. I just wish that Mr. Andhyarujina had quoted Munshi Premchand’s story than some convention of the British parliament in his Op-ed.

Anyway – British convention or Panchayat tradition – Mr. Karat definitely needs to learn a lot about being ‘principled’ in his political stance for the nation.
.

Comments

  1. Expecting Indian politicians to put country and constitution above personal and party interest is like expecting Charles Sobhraj becoming Asha Ram Bapu.
    If Mr. Somnath Chatterjee indeed resists Mr. Karat's overtures and discharges his duties without bias, he will prove himself to be an exceptional exception in India's history, which is littered with instances of politicians in constitutional positions like President, Governor and Speaker shamelessly aiding their parties without being concerned about the dignity of their position.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How will travel industry transform post-Covid

Unlike philosophers, journalists and teenagers, the world of entrepreneurship does not permit the luxury of gazing into a crystal ball to predict the future. An entrepreneur’s world is instead made of MVPs (Minimum Viable Product), A/B Tests, launching products, features or services and gauging / measuring their reception in the market to arrive at verifiable truths which can drive the business forward. Which is why I have never written about my musings or hypothesis about travel industry – we usually either seek customer feedback or launch an MVPised version and gather market feedback. However, with Covid-19 travel bans across the globe, the industry is currently stuck – while a lot of industry reports and journalistic conjectures are out, there’s no definitive answer to the way forward. Besides there is no way to test your hypothesis since even the traveller does not know what they will do when skies open. So, I decided to don my blogger hat and take the luxury of crystal gazing...

A Guide to Privacy on Social Media [apps]

The recent announcement by WhatsApp to update its privacy terms - and 'accept or leave the app' stance - led to an exodus of users from Whastapp to competing, privacy-conscious apps such as Telegram or Signal. A week after the exodus began, Whatsapp clarified its stance - and WhatsApp's CEO went about providing a long Twitter clarification . And then, many returned, many who considered moving stayed put on Whatsapp. This post is meant for those who are still sitting on the fence - it clarifies questions like: What is this all about? What do I do? Is Whatsapp safe? I've heard Telegram is Russian - so how is it safer than Whatsapp? I can't move because my business contacts are on Whastapp - how do I secure myself? PS: I've modeled this post based on several conversations I've had with friends and family on this subject, dealing with the chain of questions they ask, then objections they raise, then clarifications they seek - and finally the change resistance ...

Learning from 11 years in KPMG

It is only when we give up what we have is when we can embrace the new! I quit my job at KPMG one year ago - 22 January 2016 was my last day with the firm. As I reflect back on that day, it felt more like a graduation day! The eerie mix of nostalgia, excitement, anxiety and blues of missing your friends. KPMG was not just my first job but also a place where I learnt everything that I represent professionally. KPMG is one of the institutions I deeply respect and love – and relationships I have built here will stay with me for my lifetime. In my entrepreneurial career as well, I am often reminded more of all the great things I have learnt over my 11 years in KPMG. An year gone by, I realize these learnings have stayed with me and apply equally to the world outside KPMG. Almost all would apply to those working in role of (internal or external) consultants but several are generic and can be applied across professions. I have tried to change the text so that the learnings sound ...