Skip to main content

To be free or not?

Note (Click to expand)
The question is not whether we will live or die - the question is whether we will be free or not - Subhash Chandra Bose
I have been debating with myself whether to make this post or not for the past 15-20 days and finally decided in its favour. If it offends anyone in any way, I apologise beforehand.

Think of all the activities that give you emotional or physical pleasures - love, food, sex, self-praise, anger and above all physical inactivity (आलस ). Of course all of us would differ in the level of pleasure these activities give us, nevertheless it cannot be denied that all the above do give us pleasure to some extent. Notice the similarity of the above list to the biblical 7 sins and also notice the fact that these are pleasure-points that we share with animals.

On the other hand think of what gives you intellectual pleasures - you would define many activities like work and arts, but if you think deeply it is just one word - freedom! Freedom from all ailment, freedom from ignorance etc. etc.

But humans are a unique and complex species! We tend to mix up both - have you ever thought that you were better off with your parents around to take care of you as a kid than now? You were not free then - yet you enjoyed those moments more than today when you are ‘free’. I don’t mean to say that your parents kept you bonded, but simply that, at that age you could seldom do any activity without help from your parents.

My point is humans as an animal are averse to freedom; while humans as an intellectual being crave for nothing but freedom.

Animal instincts - love; emotion; anger - going out of your own control - slavery

Intellectual instincts - practising your passions; doing what you want; non-subordination; being free; not getting governed by anyone else’s wishes - freedom

Humans are basically a conflict between the animal self and the intellectual self and our behaviour is (to pick words from the Matrix movies) ‘the sum of the remainders of a set of unbalanced equations’ - we are an anomaly because we are not balanced.

All animals are balanced by their animal instincts - hence the food chain survives. One animal is subordinate to the other; the stronger one eats the other and thus the food chain. But we humans are an anomaly - a break in the food chain; due to our intellectual self we can defeat the Lion which is far stronger in physical strength.

This is an anomaly in the perfect world of nature - and so we come to the eternal truth - nature can be balanced by only one means - removal of the human species.
.

Comments

  1. Mr. Nikhil Kulkarni

    I read your blog 'To be Free or Not?' I liked your classification of the human instincts: animal and intellectual ones.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You classification idea is great.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How will travel industry transform post-Covid

Unlike philosophers, journalists and teenagers, the world of entrepreneurship does not permit the luxury of gazing into a crystal ball to predict the future. An entrepreneur’s world is instead made of MVPs (Minimum Viable Product), A/B Tests, launching products, features or services and gauging / measuring their reception in the market to arrive at verifiable truths which can drive the business forward. Which is why I have never written about my musings or hypothesis about travel industry – we usually either seek customer feedback or launch an MVPised version and gather market feedback. However, with Covid-19 travel bans across the globe, the industry is currently stuck – while a lot of industry reports and journalistic conjectures are out, there’s no definitive answer to the way forward. Besides there is no way to test your hypothesis since even the traveller does not know what they will do when skies open. So, I decided to don my blogger hat and take the luxury of crystal gazing...

A Guide to Privacy on Social Media [apps]

The recent announcement by WhatsApp to update its privacy terms - and 'accept or leave the app' stance - led to an exodus of users from Whastapp to competing, privacy-conscious apps such as Telegram or Signal. A week after the exodus began, Whatsapp clarified its stance - and WhatsApp's CEO went about providing a long Twitter clarification . And then, many returned, many who considered moving stayed put on Whatsapp. This post is meant for those who are still sitting on the fence - it clarifies questions like: What is this all about? What do I do? Is Whatsapp safe? I've heard Telegram is Russian - so how is it safer than Whatsapp? I can't move because my business contacts are on Whastapp - how do I secure myself? PS: I've modeled this post based on several conversations I've had with friends and family on this subject, dealing with the chain of questions they ask, then objections they raise, then clarifications they seek - and finally the change resistance ...

Learning from 11 years in KPMG

It is only when we give up what we have is when we can embrace the new! I quit my job at KPMG one year ago - 22 January 2016 was my last day with the firm. As I reflect back on that day, it felt more like a graduation day! The eerie mix of nostalgia, excitement, anxiety and blues of missing your friends. KPMG was not just my first job but also a place where I learnt everything that I represent professionally. KPMG is one of the institutions I deeply respect and love – and relationships I have built here will stay with me for my lifetime. In my entrepreneurial career as well, I am often reminded more of all the great things I have learnt over my 11 years in KPMG. An year gone by, I realize these learnings have stayed with me and apply equally to the world outside KPMG. Almost all would apply to those working in role of (internal or external) consultants but several are generic and can be applied across professions. I have tried to change the text so that the learnings sound ...